home
articles on war on cancer
ACADEMICS USE "STRUCTURED SILENCE":
QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES WIDESPREAD,
NEW REPORT SAYS
From The Cancer Chronicles #19
© January 1994 by Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.
How widespread in science are such "questionable practices" as
lying, cheating, or misappropriating resources?Defenders of
orthodoxy claim they are rare. For example, the editor of Science,
Daniel E. Koshland, Jr., once said that "99.9999 percent of reports
are accurate and truthful."Those who have questioned such
assertions have often been accused of being anti-science.
A report in American Scientist (Nov.-Dec. 1993), however, belies
Dr. Koshland's "Ivory pure" statistic, for it shows in a rigorous
way that serious misconduct is in fact widespread in mainstream
American science. This pioneer report examines four disciplines,
two of which--chemistry and microbiology--have strong ties to
medicine.
The report was written by Dr. Judith P. Swazey, founder of the
Acadia Institute in Maine, and two colleagues from the
University of Minnesota. They surveyed 4,000 doctoral students
and faculty members at 99 of the country's largest graduate
departments. The survey covered 15 different types of ethically
wrong or questionable behavior, including plagiarism,
falsification of data, inappropriate assignment of authorship to
research papers, use of university resources for personal
purposes, misuse of research funds, as well as sexual harassment
and racial discrimination. The study was funded by the National
Science Foundation.
The questionnaires sought to discover the rate of exposure to
perceived misconduct. The authors asked respondents if they had
personally observed or had other direct evidence of such
misbehavior by their teachers or colleagues.
The researchers found that ethical problems are hardly limited to
a few "bad apples," who buckle under pressure to "publish or
perish."
"We found that 44 percent of students and 50 percent of faculty
have been exposed to two or more types of misconduct and
questionable research practices," the authors revealed. "The
cumulative exposure of graduate students and faculty to what
they define as ethically wrong or dubious behavior suggest that
there are significant challenges to the integrity of academic
science that reach directly in the research enterprise." Such
problems are more pervasive than many insiders believe.
The report explodes the myth that science can police itself: many
of those surveyed reported that they have remained quiet out of
fear of reprisals. The authors call such self-censorship by
scientists "structured silence." Among the findings:
* Between 6-9% reported direct knowledge of faculty plagiarizing
or falsifying data.
"Environments that foster expectations of retaliation, coupled
with low levels of exercised collective responsibility for the
conduct of colleagues and students, raise grave concerns about
the willingness and ability of academic research communities to
govern the conduct of their peers and students," the authors of
the report concluded.
"Our survey data, and statements by faculty and graduate
students whom we have interviewed, challenge the idea that
faculty actually practice an ethic of collective governance."
Coordinator Anne Beattie
@ 144 St. John's Place,
Brooklyn, NY 11217;
Phone 718-636-4433
Fax 718-636-0186