The year 1996 marks the twenty-fifth anniversary of President Nixon's "war on cancer." During this time, the federal government has spent over $25 billion on cancer research, while the American Cancer Society (ACS) and various other private organizations have spent a nearly equal sum. When this war was launched in 1971, leading scientists promised Congress a cure for at least one major form of cancer in time for the Bicentennial. That didn't happen, and almost everyone agrees that the results have been meagre. Something is terribly wrong with the war on cancer, and this book attempts to tell why.
I started the research for this book soon after I was hired at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center as science writer (later assistant director of public affairs) in 1974. I began writing after I was fired in 1977 for opposing their coverup of positive data on the drug laetrile, an incident described in this book. I had, in the words of the New York Times, had acted in a manner that conflicted with "most basic job responsibilities" (November 24, 1977). In other words, I refused to collaborate in falsifying evidence.
The book (then called The Cancer Syndrome) was published in 1980 and went through six printings and various editions, was featured on '60 Minutes,' and serialized in newspapers and magazines, here and abroad. Then, between 1987 and 1990 I updated and expanded it into the present volume. There have been many requests for a new edition. In studying the text, I find that it would be difficult to simply update it, without taking into account fundamental changes in todayıs situation. And that would be a new book. Rather than trying to unweave the web, I have made only minor changes, but have decided to provide the reader with this extended preface to explain how things have fundamentally changed.
First, however, you should understand the following facts:
Given all this, you might conclude that things are even worse than is indicated in this book. Yet that is not the case. In fact, on the whole, the situation for alternative medicine is more promising than it has been for many years. How can that be? Because when we look at things in perspective, the forces of repression are losing ground, while interest in alternative medicine is growing. Since around 1992, there has been a shift in the publicıs perception of this area.
The key is that the federal government has changed its stance. Because of this, media interest has been unleashed and die-hard opponents are increasingly isolated as out of step with current realities. Amazingly, even the ACS has (for the moment, at least) stopped distributing its notorious "unproven methods" sheets and is rethinking its whole negative approach. The NCI remains highly derogatory, but that too could change in the next few years.
How did this happen? And what does it portend for the future? That is what I want to write about in this new preface.
Coordinator Anne Beattie
@ 144 St. John's Place,
Brooklyn, NY 11217
Phone 718-636-4433
Fax 718-636-0186
E-mail: mail@ralphmoss.com
Web site: http://www.ralphmoss.com