Government Reform and Oversight Committee
February 4, 1998
Ms. Becky Nippert
My name is Becky Nippert. I am forty-four years old and live in Memphis
(Germantown), Tennessee. In '75 I became a registered nurse, and in '82
I became a nurse anesthetist. In '89 when I was 35 years old, I was diagnosed
with breast cancer. At this time I was married with three small children,
age: 5, 3 and 5 months. I had a mastectomy, placement of a Hickman catheter
to do six months of intense chemotherapy and two breast reconstructive surgeries
that year. I was very sick from treatment and lost my hair. In '93 the cancer
returned in the same area. The surgery I had removed much of the chest muscle
to prepare me for the 37 radiation treatments I received while working full-time
and raising my three children as a single parent. My marriage ended in divorce
four months before the recurrence. While I took radiation, I was put on
the drug Tamoxifen, which was short-lived because of the severe side effects.
Six months after finishing radiation, I had another reconstructive surgery.
Seven weeks later, in August '94, I went for my cancer checkup and reported
to my doctor rib pain, genial loss of a sense of well-being and fatigue.
He checked the tumor marker Ca 15-3, which is a blood test that, when elevated,
indicates cancer activity in the blood. Normal is 3 to 27. My previous results
had never been elevated. The test result was 49. An enlarged lymph node
had come up in my neck and my doctor ordered a bone scan which showed tumor
invasion in my sternum and two ribs. I got a rib biopsy on the rib which
was fractured by cancer activity and it confirmed metastatic breast cancer
to the bones. He recommended the only thing left, the stem cell rescue or
bone-marrow transplant. I had heard of some success with this for Iymphomas
or leukemias, but in all the patients I talked to with breast cancer who
had this therapy, none had a good result from it.
All reported recurrences rather quickly after that or their families
reported they had passed. This is an accepted treatment covered by insurance.
A second opinion was to get my ovaries out, get my affairs in order and
get the bone-marrow transplant. My original tumor was estrogen receptor
positive, which means tumor growth is aggravated and enhanced by the presence
of estrogen. I had ovary surgery, thereby cutting out most of the estrogen
production in my body. I did get my affairs in order and this relieved me
of some stress. While I was thinking about the bone-marrow transplant and
weighing what to do, I started the first three standard chemo treatments
to prepare me for it. The hospital where I went put me on the bone-marrow
transplant unit. The person in the room next to me was on kidney dialysis
for shutdown of her kidneys secondary to the bone-marrow transplant. The
patient in the next room was sent to the intensive care unit for septre
shock. The 32-year old female patient next to her was rocking back and forth
on her bed babbling to herself. When I asked what was wrong with her, I
was told she had been isolated 52 days and was in an isolation psychosis,
but she would probably eventually be all right. After this chemo, my tumor
markers went up to 59, and in the seven weeks since my bone recurrence,
my tumor load had increased from 3 to 13 bone tumors. My bill for one week
in the hospital for chemotherapy was $33,000.00. At this point I heard about
an experimental treatment that had positive results from trials in Monterrey,
Mexico. Trials had also started in Freeport, Bahamas. Since the oncology
experts had given me a less than one percent for survival, and I didn't
see how the bone-marrow transplant could help, but only harm me further,
I decided to try the treatment. I went to Freeport and got on this therapy,
which was to be given by IV three times a week after I go back home.
After being on the therapy two weeks, my tumor markers went down to 49
and in the next few months they went to 41 to 29 to 21 and then down in
the teens and to this day have not been elevated. My tumors started to disappear
on the bone scans. I aborted the pursuit of the bone-marrow transplant.
My quality of life was good and most of my bone pain subsided. In September
'95, when I was trying to order new treatment from the company, I was told
after repeated attempts to reach them that the company had been raided by
the F.D.A. and there would be no more distribution of this treatment in
this country again. No explanations were given. I had been cut off from
the therapy that was making me well. I wrote President Clinton and received
a form letter from the White House. I wrote the Commissioner of the F.D.A.,
David Kessler, several times and never personally heard from him, but got
form letters from the F.D.A. The last one I received said that they were
sorry that they could be of no further assistance to me. I wrote my Senators
and Congressmen. To this day, two and a half years later, I still don't
know what happened. I was able to get some extra treatment from a nearby
hospital which ad used it prior to the F.D.A shutdown.
My local doctor didn't feel like he could treat me anymore. I asked the
doctor in Freeport, Bahamas, to let me have some of the medicine. I knew
there were about 2000 doses of the treatment in a freezer in that medical
clinic down there. I told her I would keep quiet and would move myself and
children down there. She said no. I found out that the F.D.A. had gone down
to question her and investigate. This is the same agency I called and could
never get an answer that they even knew anything about it. I was able to
get a small supply and a freezer to keep in my home. Three times a week
I struggled to get IVS started on myself to administer the medicine. Many
nights it was a blood bath, sticking myself up to nine times. Thank God
I was a nurse with the ability to do this. When the medicine was gone, I
still had three bone tumors.
In February '96, I came to this building and appeared before a subcommittee
at a hearing of the Commerce Committee to gain access to the treatment that
had been shutdown. Four of us patients on this specific therapy testified
and two other patients came to lend moral support. We pleaded to get our
treatment back. We all were recovering and doing well on it. Nothing happened
to help us and today three of those patients are dead and one on his death
bed. Only two of us are still alive, and we were the ones that were able
to stay on the medicine longer than the others. We were all given the death
sentence by conventional medicine. We tried an unconventional new therapy.
We were getting our lives back and doing well when the medicine was pulled
with no explanation or help from anyone. This negligence killed them. In
my field it is called malpractice.
There was no one we could find to help us as patients. I heard on the
second panel that today there is a lawyer who represents patients to the
F.D.N Why, in the run-around and phone tag with all these important people,
were we not told about him? Is this something new or something that was
not available two years ago? No one was there for us. One person on that
committee said they wanted to do no harm. Let me tell you what goes on down
in the trenches. I am a cancer veteran. I have been there and done that.
My friend, Rosemary, got some metastasis in her lung from breast cancer.
She got the stem cell rescue at Christmas and died New Year's eve of liver
failure, not from the cancer, but the treatment. She is dead at 42-years
old. Merrilee Malcom, my friend from Atlanta, wanted alternative therapy
and begged for it after being refractory to standard therapy. She died at
age 32. She was written off and not helped after chemo. They told her she
failed therapy. She did not fail chemo. Chemo failed her. Please wake up.
Many more people have died from cancer than in the holocaust, and we are
even having to debate this? We, as a country, have failed miserably in this
I have been a nurse and a nurse anesthetist my whole adult life. I tried
everything conventional first. It didn't work and when I found something
that did, my government cut it off with no provisions for the patients that
were benefitting from it. Many patients that were doing well on this treatment
have died. The only thing they were protected from was hope and life. Since
then I have been on a treatment from Germany. I have been totally cancer
free with clear scans since last summer. I am alive today because of prayer
and alternative treatments. At this point give us the treatments we need.
Remember we were written off and given the death sentence. Is this inhumane
to do research on humans? I was glad to be a guinea pig. Speaking as a guinea
pig and cancer patient, I say no. We have nothing to lose and maybe something
to gain. We can advance medicine in the process.
We don't have a powerful lobby like the pharmaceutical companies. After
we are diagnosed, cut on, treated with poison and then radiated, most of
us are worn out. We have then become victims of the cancer industry and
most can't speak for themselves anymore because they have been beaten down
in every area. Conventional therapy has had total control from 50 to 100
years. We have more cancer and more people dying from cancer than ever before.
We are not exploring the unknown or allowing people with different opinions
a chance. We only go for mediocrity and maintaining the status quo. We are
falling behind and are definitely not on the cutting edge. We put down anyone
with an individual idea or something new and original. We stay in our comfort
zones at the expense of people's lives. We don't branch out into areas we
don't fully understand. How can we when the requirement to approved treatment
is $240,000,000 and ten years of trials, the last of which is on humans.
Overseas where the medical giants are, they are allowed to use different
procedures without these almost totally impossible requirements. Many people
here are too weak to travel to other countries or can't afford it. I, and
many others, would like therapies with decreased side effects. Give us the
choice. Medicine can be advanced so that we can find out what works well
on different types of cancer. Why not give us our treatment of choice? Remember
we are talking mainly of people here who are at the end-stage. What do we
and what do you have to lose? The patients, more than anyone else, know
they may die. They have already been written oú Open up to more than
one bias and give other types of therapies a chance. It has to come from
you. The doctors just can't start doing it unless it is approved by you.
I have a friend in Seattle, Washington, who is a radiation oncologist,
and lost his medical license for using alternative therapies in his practice.
He gave his patients choices and they did well. When he wanted to appeal
to the Supreme Court, he was told he couldn't do that because it was against
the ruling of the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society
and the National Health Institute. They are basically immune and have no
accountability. This is where it ended. The heads of these and the H.M.O.s,
who now control medicine, make seven-figure salaries. They will keep giving
grants in the same areas, and we aren't doing anything but advancing. Please
open your eyes. I am alive today in spite of being abandoned and restricted
by the government while others have not been so fortunate. I was on my own
fighting to stay alive with no help at all from this free United
States, only obstacles. This is the ultimate injustice.
Please spare me the cliche "that you don't want the patients to
be harmed. " I am today cancer-free, and have been working full-time
doing anesthesia again for over a year after having been on disability for
22 months. I believe God spared me to speak for those who can't speak for
themselves. By my story, you can see the near impossibility to get anything
other than conventional therapy. Please don't turn your back to the problem
and neglect so great a need. Don't wait until it happens to your wife, husband
or child, or your prostate or breast. Don't wait until your back is against
the wall or your neck on the line. I plead with you: Help patients get other
therapies that may save their lives.
Article on 2/4 Hearings
Moss's Editorial on Hearings
home - moss
reports - books -
- contact - order
chronicles - faq
- free email newsletter